Skip to main content

Conservation and Common Sense: Working to preserve Yellowstone

When I was 25, I flew into Albuquerque, rented a car and drove for two weeks. I sketched out my route and made sure to hit as many National Parks as possible. I went to Grand Canyon National Park, Zion, the Canyonlands, and Arches (I was there a few months before the big arch fell!). It was breath taking! I would hike and just stop in awe of what an amazing resource we have in our National Parks. Standing in these places and seeing the grandeur of the Parks made me so grateful to live in a country that preserves and protects places like this.

I live in Maine and have Acadia National Park in my backyard. I worked on Mount Desert Island for 4 summers and would see thousands of tourists spend time in the Park. So many people use, enjoy and spend time in our National Parks, but, I would say few look beyond the views to what makes Acadia and the rest of the National Parks, what they are: their ecosystems.

When you go home after a great trip, there are photos and memories but the impact that all of us have on these places is taking its toll and as my generation gets older, has kids and grandkids, we need to do a better job of educating them and teaching them about appreciating these Parks and how important conservation is to ensuring the future of species like the Cutthroat trout to Yellowstone National Park. We want to ensure that the animals and fish are not just photos in an old picture book of memories telling a story of what was.

I use the Cutthroat trout (both the Yellowstone and Westslope subspecies) as an example because of the issues surrounding the fish of Yellowstone National Park and how the result of what happens now with these fish populations can have a lasting impact on the entire ecosystem in Yellowstone.

There are 11 native species of fish (the Cutthroat species are two of them) and 5 non-native species in Yellowstone. When the Park was founded, many waterways were fishless and so there was an effort made to stock the lakes, ponds and rivers. This practice continued until the 1950's. With any new population boom, there are issues. In Yellowstone, the native species like the Cutthroat were (and are) having to battle a number of other trout species (like Rainbow, Brown and Brook) for food and a solid, healthy habitat while dealing with a high number of Lake trout that prey on them.
There is also illness. Whirling disease is an infection that destroys the cartilage of young trout and causes them to become unable to feed or escape from their water and land predators. As the picture shows, the cartilage turns black as the disease takes over the fish. The result is a kill off of the next generation of young and a massive population hole.

There are more problems facing the Cutthroat (there are 7 invasive aquatic species in the waters of Yellowstone plus human interference and good ole' Mother Nature) but if we could stop and think about it, they are not alone. If we took a step back and thought about the world around us and how with one thing removed from the circle, in this case the Cutthroat, it could have so many repercussions that could change the waterways and overall ecosystem, of Yellowstone forever. I am guilty of this; I hunt and am slowly getting into fishing but until I wanted to enter this essay contest, I had never thought about what my responsibility is as a conservationist to promote a better understanding of how it all works. How many of us - those who regularly read this blog and those of you who will for the competition - have talked to friends and family about what we are passionate about (hunting, fishing, hiking etc) and the details around how these resources can be sustained?

It is wonderful to have people interested in supporting the effort to keep the wolves, bears, bison and elk herds healthy in Yellowstone, but in order to truly have an impact on the future, we need to look a step or two down the food chain. It is important that we look at what sustains the animals we have grown to associate with Yellowstone and work to keep a fragile ecosystem in balance. Fish are an intricate part of this as they provide food for grizzly bears, eagles, otters, herons and a number of other birds and animals. If we can put our efforts and awareness into the issues surrounding the fisheries in Yellowstone National Park, we would be taking steps to preserve the beauty and awe that is Yellowstone.










This is my submission for the Trout Unlimited, Simms, the Yellowstone Park Foundation and the Outdoor Blogger Network – Blogger Tour 2012 contest.

Comments

  1. Nice post. I agree with you that it really is about personal responsibility, not only for issues large like Yellowstone but also for local issues. Good luck in the contest.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Eagles on the trail

Reason number 3,657,935 why my Dad is the best: As we were snowmobiling, we approached a bog and three eagles with about 20 crows took off.  It could only mean one thing in my book - something was dead.  We circled back and walked around in the snow but the birds had left and we couldnt find anything that would resemble a meal.  A part of me thinks that we were in the wrong piece of land and should have been on the other side of the bog but in our snowmobile gear, we were not going to cover a lot of ground.  I was disappointed that we couldn't find what the birds were eating but I was able to get some good pictures of one of the mature eagles and the immature eagle that were flying around.






Where are the women?

This week, my interview with Steve at The Maine Outdoorsman went live. Steve said yesterday 200 people hit his site viewing over 500 pages. That is a lot of people reading about little ole me and hunting. Why? When I think of women who are in the general public's eye and hunt, I can think of 2 - Country singer Miranda Lambert and Sarah Palin. Why only two? Why is the female hunter such a fascinating thing? (I should probably note that I do not have cable so any and all female hunters on the hunting stations are lost to me. I'll keep it to the general public because that's what I am familiar with.) People/media were fascinated by the fact that they could get footage of Palin and her gun, shooting (and gutting) animals but I feel like the nostalgia would be lost if they had the same footage of McCain. Lambert and her hubby Blake Shelton tweet photos of their kills, and comment on what/where they are hunting. I only know this because I follow both. That's it.…

Wanted: Mr. Sportsman

A friend of mine sent me this link and asked what I thought about it.  I had seen it before and was honest when I told him how degrading I felt it was.  Not only was the title of the "Miss Maine Sportsman" application in pink* but the questions were incredibly insulting to those of us that are fighting to be taken seriously among our male counterparts.

Questions like, "Do you clean your own kills/catches?" would never be asked if it were Mr. Maine Sportsman.  It would be assumed that yes, of course men clean what they kill.  Why is that assumption not made of us outdoor women?  Another question, "Do cook [sic] what you catch/kill? If so, what’s your favorite recipe?" would never be asked of men.  

My friend asked me what sort of questions I would ask if it were a Mr. Maine Sportsman pageant.  I came up with a bunch of snarky questions (Do you bait your own hook?) but then I thought about the questions that could have the most impact on the men that would…