Skip to main content

Aging a bear by its skull

When you kill a bear in Maine, you are legally required to submit a tooth to IF&W so that the bear can be aged and logged into the records.  Each tooth is cut, like a tree, and the rings are counted. Biologists can learn about the health of the bear and it's age. Assuming that the tooth gets to where it needs to be.

Typically, it takes a year for the data to be published.  The link to the information is usually posted all over social media and eager hunters share how old their bear was.  I couldn't wait to find out how old this guy was. The popular vote was about 8 years old.

When the data was posted, I searched.  I looked up my name.  I looked up my guide's name. I looked up the tagging station and the date.  I knew a few numbers in my tag and couldn't even find that. My bear was not listed!

I sit on the Black Bear subcommittee for the Big Game Species planning process and see Jen Vashon and Randy Cross almost monthly.  So, I asked Jen about my bear's missing tooth. I gave her my tag number, where I shot the bear and where I had tagged it.  She started diving into computer records to see what she could find.  Meanwhile, Randy asked about the skull.  After handling more than 4,000 bears in his 32+ year career, he was pretty good at aging a bear by its skull and teeth.

I quickly pulled up these pictures and asked him what he thought.  I explained that most people who looked at the bear thought that he was 8.   He laughed, "It was more than 400 pounds... no way is that bear eight years old."

Randy started talking about the characteristics that stand out on a skull.  First: the teeth.  Since my skull had been cut several times, in order for the skull to be put back together, it had to be glued and is now one piece and not two.  Randy could guess by looking at the picture of the teeth but it wasn't totally clear and no pictures showed the inside ware of the bottom teeth.

The top of the skull though was a different story: The crest was big, height-wise and length-wise. It ran along the entire top of the skull.  Randy explained that you only see that in old bears and you can age them based on how big that ridge is.

You can tell the age of a bear based on the crest on top of their skull

Another telling characteristic is how smooth the bone is.  In the second picture, you can see that my bear's skull is not smooth but bumpy and porous looking. That is another sign of an old bear.  As bears age, so do their bones and they begin to break down.  Young bears have very smooth skulls but the older ones... you can see where the bones are starting to separate. 


The porous-looking skull indicates that the bear is old and its bones are beginning to break down


From the photos that I showed Randy and his decades of knowledge (he has more years of experience than ANY bear biologist in North America) he estimated that at the very least, my bear was 12-15 years old. At least. 

Jen returned with a piece of paper in her hand.  There were 7 bears tagged at the station that I tagged my bear in. Only two of them were aged (via teeth) but I was listed in the kill log, so my info and tag were in the system. There was a chance that since I shot my bear late in the season, it was sent in late or sent in with the 2015 bears and could turn up at some point.  

Or, the dope who registered my bear didn't send in the tooth. 

I was fortunate enough to have Randy and Jen help me figure out the age of this bear. The lost tooth just adds to the incredible story and issues that I have had with this bear since that second when I squeezed the trigger. 

Comments

  1. Randy knows his stuff for sure. Explain to me why the skull was cut several times in order to be put back together.???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The skull was cut because the butcher didn't know what he was doing. He cut it in half and almost cut one of those pieces in half. Luckily, my guide stopped him from ruining it any further and my taxidermists knew what they were doing to glue all of the pieces back together = minus the cheek bone that was destroyed.

      Delete
    2. Bizarre I don't think I would use that butcher again.

      Delete
    3. Never ever! I had a record book bear until he got to it.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Eagles on the trail

Reason number 3,657,935 why my Dad is the best: As we were snowmobiling, we approached a bog and three eagles with about 20 crows took off.  It could only mean one thing in my book - something was dead.  We circled back and walked around in the snow but the birds had left and we couldnt find anything that would resemble a meal.  A part of me thinks that we were in the wrong piece of land and should have been on the other side of the bog but in our snowmobile gear, we were not going to cover a lot of ground.  I was disappointed that we couldn't find what the birds were eating but I was able to get some good pictures of one of the mature eagles and the immature eagle that were flying around.






Where are the women?

This week, my interview with Steve at The Maine Outdoorsman went live. Steve said yesterday 200 people hit his site viewing over 500 pages. That is a lot of people reading about little ole me and hunting. Why? When I think of women who are in the general public's eye and hunt, I can think of 2 - Country singer Miranda Lambert and Sarah Palin. Why only two? Why is the female hunter such a fascinating thing? (I should probably note that I do not have cable so any and all female hunters on the hunting stations are lost to me. I'll keep it to the general public because that's what I am familiar with.) People/media were fascinated by the fact that they could get footage of Palin and her gun, shooting (and gutting) animals but I feel like the nostalgia would be lost if they had the same footage of McCain. Lambert and her hubby Blake Shelton tweet photos of their kills, and comment on what/where they are hunting. I only know this because I follow both. That's it.…

Wanted: Mr. Sportsman

A friend of mine sent me this link and asked what I thought about it.  I had seen it before and was honest when I told him how degrading I felt it was.  Not only was the title of the "Miss Maine Sportsman" application in pink* but the questions were incredibly insulting to those of us that are fighting to be taken seriously among our male counterparts.

Questions like, "Do you clean your own kills/catches?" would never be asked if it were Mr. Maine Sportsman.  It would be assumed that yes, of course men clean what they kill.  Why is that assumption not made of us outdoor women?  Another question, "Do cook [sic] what you catch/kill? If so, what’s your favorite recipe?" would never be asked of men.  

My friend asked me what sort of questions I would ask if it were a Mr. Maine Sportsman pageant.  I came up with a bunch of snarky questions (Do you bait your own hook?) but then I thought about the questions that could have the most impact on the men that would…